If SJ takes Ivar Stenberg, should the Canucks take Chase Reid at #3?

If SJ takes Ivar Stenberg, should the Canucks take Chase Reid at #3?



Assuming San Jose takes Ivar Stenberg at #2, should the Canucks take Chase Reid at #3?

@mattsekeres | @justBlakePrice | @risingaction

Presented by @YellowDogBeer


https://www.facebook.com/SekeresandPrice

@sekeresandprice


https://www.youtube.com/sekeresprice
https://www.instagram.com/sekeresandprice

πŸ“§ live@sekeresandprice.com
πŸ“² 778-402-9680

https://www.sekeresandprice.com/
https://www.rinkwidevancouver.com

#Canucks #VancouverCanucks #NHL #Hockey

View Comments (27)
  1. Since we need absolutely everything, you take the best player available. Having said that, I always say you should take the best player available, and if you don't need him, trade for what you do need.

  2. In a rebuild always take BPA but look to fill the D stable early as it often takes longer for them to develop and contribute on the big club. It just so happens that BPA and the D position coincide at #3

    Reid
    Carels
    Verheoff

  3. O give me a break get out of here u guys r a joke just let them do there thing so sick of this pick this kid pick that kid just give it up already… u guys make me lol πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  4. Canucks need star players at every position: center, defense, wing, and in goal. So it certainly does not hurt to get a defenseman, but Reid? Do we need a sequel to Quinn Hughes (including the part ehere he leaves)? I'd rather have Carels or Verhoff then pick someone else who just leaves after a few years in the lineup. Silky smooth sounds appealing, like QH did too, but in his case proved fragile. This team needs some snarl as well.

Comments are closed.