“The ‘are you truly undertanding the excersize’ pivots on a Conor Garland trade…there will be a point in his extension where it’s not a great contract, so get ahead of it” #Canucks
Tweets by sekeresandprice
https://www.facebook.com/SekeresandPrice
@sekeresandprice
https://www.youtube.com/sekeresprice
https://www.instagram.com/sekeresandprice
📧 live@sekeresandprice.com
📲 778-402-9680
https://www.sekeresandprice.com/
https://www.rinkwidevancouver.com
#Canucks #VancouverCanucks #NHL #Hockey
12 Comments
But do the Canucks have anyone who works as hard as Garland?
I’d like to keep him around just to teach the kids that. Like you said, he’s middle six, we’re not keeping him for points, we’re keeping him cuz he’s a work horse and will (hopefully) teach the next gen to be work horses – winning, losing, in contention or not… when you’re on the ice, you’re give 100%.
Agreed. It’s not time to be nice anymore. He doesn’t have no trade protection, means he’s got to go.
Jake and Brock do, so they get a say in what happens. If they want to stay, they stay. But Garland can get you real pieces back and he doesn’t.
Love him, but the man’s got to go.
If the thought is to move your hardworking culture guys and keep the overpaid, under producers, then he’s your man.
I think Garland has earned a spot on the rebuild. We do still have to put a team out there. Draft picks can’t suit up
Buy low sell high. Canucks have been burned, as other teams have, on signing again players at market, to term. Just get the picks and sign a checker out of college or something.
Agree. Look at other teams, you are trading away a long term contract, get some picks, then open up the cap space to get some bad short term, expiring contracts plus picks to your way. Ilya Mikheyev is the perfect example.
You need some vets, and from reports he is good in the room. I would you listen if the offer blows you away.
Not into the big tank – will be 70 before they make play off runs & I have been watching since 1970 . 65 now —– Thought Rutherford would do something different but just the same shit in a different pile .
Sorry kids, he's not your boyfriend. If he can get you a valuable return, do it. We can bring in hardworking veterans for much cheaper when we need him. The true rebuild hasn't actually started, where have a surplus of young prospects graduating to the NHL, at least not elite ones. When we start seeing these top 3 draft picks graduating, then we can make a move for guys like O'Reilly who can show the kids the way.
Yes you'd like to trade him but keeping him a year or two if the production increases and his value gets better isn't the worst. Again only if you're not getting the return you'd want. Hypothetically not getting a first
Demko has to go either now or the summer before his new contract kicks in
Or is he our brendan gallagher?