Mastodon
@Carolina Hurricanes

Jesperi Kotkaniemi Embellishment Penalty



Uploaded By: Alyssa Hope
Channel Link: https://www.youtube.com/c/AlyssaHope

All rights go to the NHL. I do not own the music and the footage used in this video. For entertainment purposes only.

36 Comments

  1. That is not embellishment … it is just KK falling again. That guy can fall 5 times minimum in a hockey game on his own, it is his deer on ice special skating technique.

  2. I think the referees make calls judging and which one hasn't been called the longest. Waiting for a goalie delay-of-game

  3. If you watched the game you’d understand this is a make up call for a high sticking to Dallas that wasn’t a Dallas stick and was obvious after review…

  4. In the end the Stars totally cuffed the Canes last night. The shot differential was over rated. Carolina didn't have that many good looks. The Dallas defensive game is SMOTHERING! Be Loud, Wear Green, Go Stars!

  5. 0:39 They way Kotkaniemis right skate cuts into the ice after the hook sure is some talanted embellishment skills.

  6. no surprise homer Tripp Tracy doesnt agree with the call.. him and Jack Edwards text message each other when they are going to bed, i bet you.

  7. Jesperi is well known for Embellishement he did it famously against Mcdavid when he faked getting hit on the head i dont know if some of you guys remember ?

  8. Just wondering why this was called but the penalty Turbo took they Star reacted 30 minutes after the fact.

  9. What's wrong with the call? How does a hook in the abdomen make his legs fail? Good call by the ref.

  10. Well we all know the refs in the nhl call make up calls all the time. Officiating in every sport this year has been really bad and every league is getting softer as the years go by

  11. Referees are really starting to "pile on" against Carolina. Nhl just can not have a powerhouse in a "small market" area.

  12. Agree with the penalty or not, at least calls like this will prevent hockey from turning into what happens in soccer…

  13. Either he was hooked, and it doesn't matter how he fell, or he wasn't, and faked the fall. It cannot go both ways. I do not understand the logic behind these rules. "Oh, he was tripped…but he fell too hard for how bad the trip was, so he got a penalty too!" Like why does it matter how the person falls? If it was a rule breaking offense to cause the fall, that's all that matters.

  14. How can you call a hooking penalty when Benn had one hand on his stick? And how does calling an embellishment penalty make sense when you called a hooking penalty? My brain hurts!

Write A Comment