Mastodon
@Carolina Hurricanes

I hate to post ‘Big if true’ post at peak hand waving season, but Frank Seravalli has word that Mikael Backlund is leaning away from re-signing in Calgary. He only has one year left on his contract so would be an ideal candidate for salary retention. At 50% retained, he’d cost ~2.6M, so thoughts?



I hate to post ‘Big if true’ post at peak hand waving season, but Frank Seravalli has word that Mikael Backlund is leaning away from re-signing in Calgary. He only has one year left on his contract so would be an ideal candidate for salary retention. At 50% retained, he’d cost ~2.6M, so thoughts?

by AostheGreat

4 Comments

  1. AostheGreat

    Personally, I think picking Backlund up would be a great idea so long as it can be done on the cheap. We can’t over spend on a guy like Backlund if we want to fully address our other needs: namely, a big time scorer.

  2. MrCanoehead89

    Why would Calgary retain? I would think they’re going to swing again for the playoffs and would need to get immediate production out of every cap dollar available to them.

  3. Turbulent_System_446

    Who tf DOES want to play in Calgary?

Write A Comment