Mastodon
#Hockey

Which of these Conn-Smythe winning defensemen would you trust most to guide your team to a cup?



Which of these Conn-Smythe winning defensemen would you trust most to guide your team to a cup?

by Dev_NT

44 Comments

  1. KolhiiHead69

    Maybe Keith because he’s done it 3 times (I know Niedermayer did it 4 times, but he always has Stevens or Pronger to help him with that, and I assume I’m not getting them as well).

  2. Racethepenguin

    Hedman

    4 cup appearances in 8 seasons is insane.

  3. blue-lloyd

    The Oilers dont make the wcf last year without Keith, and my unpopular(?) opinion is that Keith retiring is entirely the source for the Oilers’ woes this season so Keith

  4. Rext7177

    Niedermayer for sure

    Also in an alternate universe pronger is the 2006 conn Smythe winner and I’m picking him

  5. No real wrong answer, they were each dominant and wholly-deserving of their Smythes.

    That said… I am of course biased but Keith’s 2015 run seems like the most impressive to me on an individual basis. He was averaging over 31 minutes of TOI/game, which was a full minute more than Neidermayer (2nd amongst these four) in his own run and a whooping *4.5 minutes* more than Hedman (fourth amongst these choices).

    He lead the entire 2015 postseason in assists and +/-, while all three of his goals were GWGs, coming in:

    – Game 1 of the first series (Nashville, OTG).

    – Game 6 of the first series (series winner).

    – Game 6 of the SCF (Cup winner).

    None of the others have comparable stats to those and I know his Smythe was unanimous , which is wild; not sure if any of the others were.

    Clutch as fuck, absolute workhorse, relied upon more heavily than anyone else, and proved it wasn’t a fluke many times over with the several other deeps runs/Cup wins before that. As the Hawks blueline continued to deteriorate over the years, Keith only got better to make up that difference.

    It’s pretty close, but I’m taking prime Duncs all day.

  6. Victor Hedman and then Chris Pronger. Either of those guys can drag a team a few rounds.

  7. No-Negotiation1240

    I assume Lidstrom is just too obvious as the clear choice so you didn’t even include him lol.

    Niedermayer out of these, dude was an elite skater when it was less known for d and he was like incredibly incredibly good at your ordinary stuff like a crisp exit pass etc.

  8. Avs_Leafs_Enjoyer

    Can’t believe people are choosing anyone but Makar. The rest are just so old and slow now

    ^^^^^/s

  9. Just-Concentrate-477

    Tampa did it without Stammer. Made the run without Kuch. Couldn’t have won B2B without Heddy. Easy answer.

  10. MollysYes

    I mean, I already trusted Neids to do it and he came through. That whole roster was insanely good though.

  11. anthkraken

    Keith I think.

    I think he should won 2 Smythe.

  12. HypeForTheHypeGod

    ….. Duncan Keith

    *vomits literally everywhere*

  13. juliusceasarsalads

    No wrong answer here, my personal preference would be Hedman or Makar

  14. BannedRemovedDeleted

    We haven’t seen Makar in his prime yet. He’s still so fucking young! The potential is there to be way better than the other 3 mentioned.

  15. JBirdSond1235

    None, Scott Stevens.

    But if Makar keeps it up for another decade them maybe.

  16. DeputyDangle19

    Niedermayer hands down. Won at every level.
    Edit: Where’s Nik Lidstrom in all of this…?

  17. polloasadotaco

    Oilers fans and their love for Duncan >

  18. bucket56

    I think it’s really important to note this is all era-dependent. Different eras had different playstyles, and certain defensemen may excel/struggle in one era versus the next depending on their strengths and weaknesses.

    If we are playing for a Cup in the year of our lord 2023, I’m going with Makar followed by Scott Niedermeyer, for their skating ability. I really think Nieds is getting underrated in this thread a bit, as he’s the most distant memory.

    Overall, across era, I have to go Duncan Keith, the biggest workhorse of them all and arguably the most well-rounded. Could shutdown, drive an offense, was nasty as all getout, and could play 100 minutes a game.

  19. ThatBasicGuy

    It is really tough to choose because there is no wrong answer. But I’d go with Hedman. Whenever I watch my Blues go up against TB, I love watching Victor. Such a smart player!

  20. stephenlipic

    Are we talking modern era? The rules were different when Niedermayer played, it isn’t really possible to know how he would fare in today’s NHL.

    For that reason I would probably go with Hedman. He’s just a beast, is huge, completely able to shut down opponents’ top lines and eats minutes like he’s Joey Chestnut on Independence Day.

    Makar would be a close 2nd but I feel like Makar still needs a Devon Toews to really thrive. With Makar/Karlsson types you’re essentially running a 3-1-1 system so you need a competent guy at the back to keep the negative events at a minimum.

    If I’m building a team I can’t know for sure I get a Devon Toews type that works well with Makar and Hedman works great with nothing but a pylon as a partner so I would be assured to have a major piece of the puzzle solved just with Hedman.

    Edit to add: Keith IMO is very good but just overall slightly worse than Hedman. Like essentially you’re getting a slightly smaller workhorse defence man. Hedman’s size just means the difference there.

  21. Keith was insane that year pulling the long ass shifts whilst maintaining playoff physicality and playmaking.

  22. DrLivingst0ne

    I’d just take Makar with no hesitation

  23. Hedman is consistently the best of these two but Keith during his heydey I think was the best of these three. Makar I think has potential to be better and eventually will be but he’s not quite there yet IMO.

  24. How, in the ever loving fuck, do you not have Nick Lidstrom in this list?

  25. defector-antal

    Makar is already superior to Hedman, I’m going with him. The next Bobby Orr.

Write A Comment