Tim Stützle scored a goal, but it was immediately waived off for goaltender interference. There was not a penalty called on the play, but the goal was taken off the board. Based on the president set earlier in this game. I think they got this one wrong. 
@Ottawa Senators
6 Comments
Its an interesting situation cause if you don't look at the precedent from this game and just look at this incident in a vacuum I'm all for this being a no-goal.
But yeah the other goal being allowed even after review in an interesting position to have from the review room and has interesting consequences if you build off of it for precedent…
It's nice that the universe sometimes balances everything, but it would be so much nicer if the people could make the right calls to begin with instead.
If the ducks had checked Stutzle into their own goalie, they could have gotten Stutzle ejected.
That's actually a really nice goal too, a mid-air backhand against momentum off the post and in? Highlight reel, too bad the league can't get its own rules straight.
This wasn't incidental contact. The contact outside of the crease was substantial.
Even if Ottawa wasn't up 2-0 near the end of the 3rd, it would have been a bad challenge.
The skates did a little more then graze as you see that whole leg move and it happens to also be the skate that the puck went under for the goal.