Mastodon
@Calgary Flames

Rasmus Andersson to the Boston Bruins?



Rumours are swirling surrounding Rasmus Andersson, and some involve the Boston Bruins.

There is reporting the Boston Bruins have offered up a package, and I break it down because my sources tell me the Bruins might not have a chance.

In this video, I break it all down for you.

#nhlbruins #bostonbruins #bostonbruinsnews

X – https://x.com/BruinsDiehards
X – https://x.com/courtlalonde
Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/bruinsdiehards/?hl=en

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbF9NnqEZWUo-th4gvsZfnQ/join

34 Comments

  1. Flame fan here & Ras is perfect for the Bruin personality. His patented stare downs after a goal with opposing fans in first row is priceless. He was good friends with Zad & Elias, I could easily see him extending. Should be a no brainer, Conroy knows how much he's wanting & all it takes is a question to his agent or him if he will extend. Offer is a reasonable one.

  2. Sounds like a Sweeney and Neeley trade. Give away your upcoming prospects and get shit in return. Jacob’s is a damn fool. Three years of the dumbest trades. They’re tanking the whole team for a first round pick that they will deal away in two or three years.

  3. We can ALWAYS use a decent top 4 D.
    BUT, he's a rental, unless they can get a signed deal for a couple years. two would be good, three ideal.

  4. Abso-fuggin-lutely not!!! He aint that great and we don't need to give up our future for this nothing burger.

  5. I mean…not sure why this is a thing. I guess it's content, but for the VERY obvious reasons mentioned here…there is no way we are in the rental game. If we are doing something like this, Sweeney will have ruined any new found fan confidence he might of gained with last year's excellent moves.

  6. No trade at all without an extension and even if he did agree to extend in Boston, the Bruins can't be trading any top picks unless for a 22 or under top 6 F or top 4 D. For Andersson I would give Lohrei even though don't want to, but I would deal Lohrei and give them 2 of any prospects in AHL even Poitras and Lysell, but no first round picks should be dealt by this team.

  7. I think he would be a very good pickup for the Bruins but Only for the right price ! I would give them their choice of our extra first rounders IF they took two of our "Problem Players'' in the deal such as Middlestat and Korpy off our hands and our Salary Cap. Then we could have the money to resign him. And just give them Lohrei because even if he's getting better defensively ,he Stunk before (Big Deal) and his offence has almost disappeared. And talk salary and term with"Mrrr. Anderson…" 😉 and if he comes for 3-4 yrs ,do it ! Who knows he may like being a Bruin 🐻 👍👍 and re- sign later. He's worth a late first rounder ,people forget they are Not all good, some don't pan out. Go Bruins Go !!!😂

  8. Heck no!! A first round for a rental? Hearing the deal is done. Which is crazy.
    Matt Poitras, Lorie and a first. For a rental. Seems nuts.
    I really believe we mismanaged Poitras. I believed he was getting more ice time this season and just before puck drop we moved him down.
    I think both guys are likely to catch up on another team.
    We must not trust our scouts handing out first rounders for rentals is bananas to me.

  9. Sweeney knows what's best for the bruins but since his draft scouts are amongst the worst in the NHL, I do not mind him trading any draft picks. But only for young guns!

  10. If he agrees to an extension hes worth it….he didn't tell calgary he wouldnt resign btw…watch his interviews….his comments " It takes 2 to tango"…. cLgary wants to get younger and have a stupid amount of up and coming young d…razzie will help big time

  11. Much rather them keep their 1st round picks this year. If they were a cup contender this trade would make sense. From what I'm hearing this draft is supposed to be pretty good for defensemen, maybe we can land a good future defensemen depending on where we land on the draft board

  12. I don’t want anyone else from Vancouver or Calgary unless his name is Hughes and we missed on that one!

  13. Latest rumors via elliot is the leafs 1st, potrais and Lorehi. If bruins do this it will be a classic fleecing…. don't do it Don.

  14. If it makes ur team better for the prime of ur core group and keeping one of those 1st and draft a future RD im all for it obviously not getting rid of your top prospects from the last two years. And the rest of this year just get rid of UFAs for picks that u can draft or package for young proven or the ones that haven’t been given the time of day in there organization. Were in a retool not a rebuild if ur in the rebuild than no if ur retooling on the fly love the deal. And im only for him coming if ext is set in stone

  15. Also if the deal goes threw after yesterday days reports looking back on Beecher getting waved was kinda a gift saying we won’t give u anything for him but we’ll claim him on this deal to or if it comes full circle

  16. So why would you give a1st round. A young defense man. And a forward that will make this bruins team. For a rental. No. Think about it. Vegas. Will do this and give away anything that Calgary. Wants

Write A Comment