Where Martin misses the mark on Schumacher, was he concentrated on race set up, especially in those Ferrari years where the Ferrari wasn't the outright fastest, but he would make the difference in the race. Hakkinen was fast when everything is working well, but Michael could get race results that others would give up on, and qualifying was just one part of the weekend.
Alright, hot take, fight me If you must: Senna was the greatest talent ever to drive an f1-car. Michael will be the GOAT because he achieved his greatest titles with a bad team and – I'm sorry for saying this – he was alive when he left the grid.
I like Senna, but come on. The greats of his era got their balls sweating by Michael. He was pushed by Michael to the limit and getting outdriven. Most are just blinded due to Senna's passing.
If Schumacher isn't the GOAT it's because Hamilton is. They're the top two, third is more open, maybe it's Prost, maybe it's Senna, maybe it's Vettel – I wouldn't get bogged down in the debate though for me it's Vettel – but let's show some respect for the 7 time champions, their numbers speak for themselves
Martin Brundl is still sore for the season of 1992 in which Schumacher totally obliterated him in the same car. Whereas with Senna he can at least say that he beat the Brazilian in British formula 3.
Brundle wasn't faster than Schumacher at Spa. Schumacher was being delayed by Patrese for much of the race and made one mistake which Martin took advantage of. After changing to slicks, Schumacher never looked back, he left everyone in the dust. Granted, he was aided by mansell suffering exhaust problems in the final three laps or so.
What an idiot. The only reason why Mika was faster than Michael was because he had such a faster car. Just look at all the Adrian Newey cars, they’re always the best. In the same car, Schumacher would whip Mika a new one and plonk on his head. Schumacher was the fastest of his era, even when he didn’t have the fastest car. He had no equal
Schumacher wasn't like Senna but schumacher was also god, beacuse for the hard working development of the cars, he was all day working on the car, with the engenniers. And that allow him to win the champonship and multiple more with Ferrari. Meanwhile, in Benneton , he had 2 world championship by the special tool with the car. The car , without that, it wouldn't too competitive for him. That's my opinion.
As Senna's defeated rival, he had to place him on an all-time throne, so only one driver in history has been a fraction faster than himself. In his prime, Senna was by far the best, then came Schumacher's time, then Vettel, Hamilton, and Verstappen. Each became a multiple world champion through talent, hard work, and favorable circumstances. Incidentally, only a few racing drivers also excel in the Race of Champions, where a wide variety of drivers compete against each other in a wide variety of cars. Schumacher was always among the best (along with the outstanding rally drivers).
Senna was talented but a Leech who hopped from best car to best car, very much Like Hamilton, Both Never Really Improved a dog shit car unlike Schumacher, Alonso, verstappen
Schumacher only ever beat Senna in 3 races at the start of the 1994 season – running in an illegal car with TC. Senna & Clark are the best drivers ever asiding the 50's era as Fangio.
24 Comments
For me the best will always be Fangio and Toivonen 🏁🤌🏼
Schumacher is the biggest ambassador of F1 in third world, which is very important. Ask yourself why!
Schumacher is the GOAT. Then Hamilton, Senna, Lauda and Verstappen. In 10 years I could be calling Max the GOAT.
Where Martin misses the mark on Schumacher, was he concentrated on race set up, especially in those Ferrari years where the Ferrari wasn't the outright fastest, but he would make the difference in the race. Hakkinen was fast when everything is working well, but Michael could get race results that others would give up on, and qualifying was just one part of the weekend.
THAT'S WHY MICHAEL ISSSS THE GOAT!!!!!
I call bs he is the GOAT!!! pace constantly fast
For Senna, Fangio was the best ever
Alright, hot take, fight me If you must: Senna was the greatest talent ever to drive an f1-car. Michael will be the GOAT because he achieved his greatest titles with a bad team and – I'm sorry for saying this – he was alive when he left the grid.
Michael Schumacher beat Senna end of story
I like Senna, but come on. The greats of his era got their balls sweating by Michael. He was pushed by Michael to the limit and getting outdriven. Most are just blinded due to Senna's passing.
Says the guy without any F1 win. How should he know 😂😂😂😂😂😂
In 15 years all will agree that max was the goat
If Schumacher isn't the GOAT it's because Hamilton is. They're the top two, third is more open, maybe it's Prost, maybe it's Senna, maybe it's Vettel – I wouldn't get bogged down in the debate though for me it's Vettel – but let's show some respect for the 7 time champions, their numbers speak for themselves
Brundle hates Schumacher because he can’t admit he was a mediocre driver and was beaten by a young Schumacher. Dishonest as a pundit
Martin Brundl is still sore for the season of 1992 in which Schumacher totally obliterated him in the same car. Whereas with Senna he can at least say that he beat the Brazilian in British formula 3.
Brundle wasn't faster than Schumacher at Spa. Schumacher was being delayed by Patrese for much of the race and made one mistake which Martin took advantage of. After changing to slicks, Schumacher never looked back, he left everyone in the dust. Granted, he was aided by mansell suffering exhaust problems in the final three laps or so.
Schumacher 😂… A class above Hakkinen…
What an idiot. The only reason why Mika was faster than Michael was because he had such a faster car. Just look at all the Adrian Newey cars, they’re always the best. In the same car, Schumacher would whip Mika a new one and plonk on his head. Schumacher was the fastest of his era, even when he didn’t have the fastest car. He had no equal
Schumacher wasn't like Senna but schumacher was also god, beacuse for the hard working development of the cars, he was all day working on the car, with the engenniers. And that allow him to win the champonship and multiple more with Ferrari. Meanwhile, in Benneton , he had 2 world championship by the special tool with the car. The car , without that, it wouldn't too competitive for him. That's my opinion.
As Senna's defeated rival, he had to place him on an all-time throne, so only one driver in history has been a fraction faster than himself. In his prime, Senna was by far the best, then came Schumacher's time, then Vettel, Hamilton, and Verstappen. Each became a multiple world champion through talent, hard work, and favorable circumstances. Incidentally, only a few racing drivers also excel in the Race of Champions, where a wide variety of drivers compete against each other in a wide variety of cars. Schumacher was always among the best (along with the outstanding rally drivers).
Jim Clarke for me was the greatest next was senna then Mika Hakkinen
Still crying dat Michael was faster 😅😅
Senna was talented but a Leech who hopped from best car to best car, very much Like Hamilton, Both Never Really Improved a dog shit car unlike Schumacher, Alonso, verstappen
Schumacher only ever beat Senna in 3 races at the start of the 1994 season – running in an illegal car with TC. Senna & Clark are the best drivers ever asiding the 50's era as Fangio.