Landy man up to Anderson who fell like a doll tripping Landeskog doing so.Last to touch the puck is Anderson skate… have no clue why they gave the goal to Landeskog unless it touches his legs before getting kicked in bt Anderson.
Definitely a good goal imo. He was basically already stopped then got slammed into the goalie by the defense. At least thatโs how it looks here from this short. What was the call?
Goaltender interference. 50/50? Clearly, the brakes didn't come on until he was in the blue. Just like Brett Hull's foot was clearly in the blue for the win, lol.
Referees gave them the win. There was a penalty at the avalanche blueline nick suzuki was being held up no call. fucking centre ice and no call fucking american refs.
The net was off before the puck went in, but also players should be stopped from plowing to the net to cause a collision. People would say that's part of hockey, maybe but then all you have to do is head straight at the goalie with the puck and fall into the net. Also what about the goalie safety. These goals should never be allowed.
Only Colorado fans or Hab haters would think this is a good goal. I mean this its not even debatable but as usual the refs and the NHL gpt it wrong. Its bush league when referees have absolutely no need for any accountability to explain their bad decisions. It shows a clear and obvious bias.
18 Comments
Why are the Habs playing the Nordiques?
Obviously no interference, he clearly got pushed in by the goalies teammate.
Nice trip by Landeskog (if you look with your eyes)
No goal. Net came off before the puck crossed the line
Avs used to be the Nordiques and this used to be a great rivalry.
Landy man up to Anderson who fell like a doll tripping Landeskog doing so.Last to touch the puck is Anderson skate… have no clue why they gave the goal to Landeskog unless it touches his legs before getting kicked in bt Anderson.
So I assume this interference wasn't called as per usual ๐
Dumb referees stealing the show again ๐๐ป
Goaltender interference needs to get patched asap
Definitely a good goal imo. He was basically already stopped then got slammed into the goalie by the defense. At least thatโs how it looks here from this short. What was the call?
Goaltender interference. 50/50? Clearly, the brakes didn't come on until he was in the blue. Just like Brett Hull's foot was clearly in the blue for the win, lol.
Referees gave them the win. There was a penalty at the avalanche blueline nick suzuki was being held up no call. fucking centre ice and no call fucking american refs.
I wonder how the people tuning in from QC felt about the Nords unis? It has to sting.
The net was off before the puck went in, but also players should be stopped from plowing to the net to cause a collision. People would say that's part of hockey, maybe but then all you have to do is head straight at the goalie with the puck and fall into the net. Also what about the goalie safety. These goals should never be allowed.
Nordiques are back?
Was there a fight to respect the old rivalry?
Only Colorado fans or Hab haters would think this is a good goal. I mean this its not even debatable but as usual the refs and the NHL gpt it wrong. Its bush league when referees have absolutely no need for any accountability to explain their bad decisions. It shows a clear and obvious bias.
Not a fan of either teams so unbiased that is not goaltender interference