Mastodon
@Boston Bruins

BRUINS TRADE RUMORS: Garland AND Sherwood Linked to Boston!



BRUINS TRADE RUMORS: Garland AND Sherwood Linked to Boston!

Are the Boston Bruins looking at making a Trade? Rumours from Vancouver suggest the Boston Bruins are interested in both Conor Garland and Kiefer Sherwood.

I break down what type of player they are and what it might cost on the latest episode of Bruins Diehards.

#nhlbruins #bostonbruins #bostonbruinsnews #nhltraderumors

Time Stamp
Intro 00:00
Rumours 01:18
Injuries 11:35
Outro 14:13

X – https://x.com/BruinsDiehards
X – https://x.com/courtlalonde
Instagram – https://www.instagram.com/bruinsdiehards/?hl=en

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbF9NnqEZWUo-th4gvsZfnQ/join

34 Comments

  1. If we get Garland for "cheap" meaning we don't lose 1st round pick and trade only 1 prospect and trade someone from the 3rd line than I guess I'm fine with it. Not happy just fine with it.

  2. No trades with Vancouver sorry .we have players like them its not worth it .

    How bout lysel an murkelov for conner geekie not huge fan of brothers on a team especially putting the injured brothers sorry hughes brothers on same team .that be a hilarious mistake

  3. I don't see sherwood,
    Yes! to Garland.

    But so far this committee and Sturm have done a pretty good job putting together their system. I might trust them right now

    A coupla days ago, I asked "where the puck are the right-wingers?!"
    😲
    Garland will find his way to Boston before he hangs up his skates. Sooner than later would be good.

    If this involves moving Korpisalo as an add-on?
    Let's think about it.
    🤔

    So far, trusting the scouts and Sweeney's committee is working –

    I was thinking sending korpisalo and Dipietro to Anaheim

    Maybe get
    Johnston
    Or less likely, throw in a second round pick for
    Sennecke

    Ducks are in goalie trouble
    As are a few teams.

    I'm ok if Dipietro wants to move on.

    Mzrazk is injured, he can recover in Boston

    Montgomery just pissed off Binnington.

    So I'm thinking any trade would involve Dipietro as a reasonable target.

  4. No and No. Garland is a nice player but his contract is several years at over $6 million a year. Both are 30ish years old. Garland is a declining asset. Sherwood is a role player that we already have. I say stand pat and continue o this road. If either player were that significant the 'Nucks wouldn't think about parting with them.
    Although I wanted Garland here a few years ago when he was with the Coyotes, that time has passed.
    Sherwood would be the better acquisition, but NO high picks. A 3rd or 4th round pick and Lysell and call it a trade.

  5. This is what I worried about. This kind of thinking is why we are where we are at. Pissing away resources to chase mediocrity. If Swayman was playing like last year, we would be in the basement right now. I doubt winning every OT game is going to last forever either. Coupled with injuries and dips in play from other teams that likely will not last either. We should sell, our cap situation versus team quality sucks balls right now and is not getting better any time soon.

  6. I think the Bruins have been playing well despite the injuries. I liked what Sturm said in his pre-game interview on Nov. 29. He basically said he doesn’t care who’s in or out of the lineup, they just need more effort. That mindset keeps the guys filling in from feeling like they’re at a disadvantage and helps them rally together as a real unit instead of just a handicapped version of the usual lineup.

  7. Sherwood is 30 years old and has only played 5 seasons in the show but never a full season. 98 pts in 265 games. I'm not giving up any prospects or picks. Sorry.

  8. If Sweeney trades either 1st rounder this year or next year; he should immediately be fired. You made a good trade by getting the 1st from Toronto. Don't screw it up by trading it for a 3rd line forward. Besides, you signed like 5 players for that exact role in the offseason.

  9. Hold. Every. Future. Asset.

    I know ownership is allergic to the idea of not getting playoff revenue, but a 1st round exit is not worth losing literally ANY prospects or picks as things currently stand.

  10. My Opinion, they should bring up both Potria and Lysell and give them a 3 or 4 game run see how it looks. and if they don't go well then yes its time to ship them out. it happens where players just don't work out with that team. I would hate for them to walk and get nothing for them. But I agree the picks should be off the table.

  11. Both are good players but I agree that Vancouver would want a big return (especially for Garland). Prefer to keep Zacha.

  12. The Bruins are not as good as their record suggests. It would be a mistake to be desperate buyers and overpay for anything this season. I think it would also be a mistake to sell any assets until there are desperate buyers willing to overpay later in the season

  13. Sending picks and prospects out because you started out the season on a roller coaster. Probably a bad idea. Plus we are in a retool, way to soon to make moves.

  14. Even if we grabbed these two we ain't winnin' a cup.
    Relax, keep our assets and let Sturm do what he is doing.
    Go Bruins.

  15. this bruins team embodies the quote from the movie Miracle…."not the best players, the right players".

  16. I don’t see the point in trading for either of those particular players right now. I think the Bruins should still be trying to acquire assets, not give them away to squeak into the playoffs. They might sneak in as is.

  17. I’ll go to my grave saying that if the Bruins don’t relax to get good draft positioning this year, they’re really hurting their future.

  18. Does not make sense that those prices.
    Some playoff team WILL pay that at the deadline, though.

    Don't see Boston in any of this unless Van wants Lysell back in the city and are willing to do a non-first package.
    But I think they can get more by just waiting for the TDL.

  19. Agree. Sherwood would be way too expensive. Any deal that would require Zacha or Minten is a no-go. Also, NO TRADING 1ST ROUND PICKS.

  20. We are still in a position of strength in that we are playing well and showcasing some talent we can move to cup contending teams near the deadline. Sure, we could make the playoffs but we are not a cup contender and adding the guys you mention here will not make us a cup contender either. Stay the course, build our future while playing decent, potential playoff hockey. Near the trade deadline, trade some of these assets to cup contenders for high prices. We can retool without selling out our future in this way. No plan should just involve making the playoffs and praying for a miracle. We want to be a legitimate contender and trading picks for midline players is no way to go. If Zacha, for instance, continues on the pace he is going at, what might we be able to get for him? Or an Arvidsson etc etc. Peake could draw great interest. GM's must be salivating at the chance to get a Kastelic near the deadline. Stay the course.

  21. Poitras makes the team 2 years in a row out of camp. Coach won't play him and give him a chance to grow. Gets sent down last year. Accepts it and lights it up at a point a game. This year, a weaker lineup, plays well in camp but gets sent down again. I do like Minten and he is getting a chance to play and grow. Seeing them both, I thought Poitras was the better skater, better edge work, and pin point passing. I would have kept Poitras over Minten, or both. Poitras probably feels crapped on by the Bruins. He's thinking, hey if you don't want me send me somewhere that does. Speculation on my part of course but the way the Bruins have mishadled young players in the past, it fits.

  22. The juice isn’t worth the squeeze! Theses guys are 30, Garland going to be 30 in March, to give up young guys and draft picks. Nahhh let the season ride and look forward to next year

Write A Comment