Ridly Greig scored a goal and added an assist on Nick Cousins’ game-winning tally to push the Ottawa Senators to a 4-2 win over the Utah Mammoth.
———————————————-
📺 http://sportsnetplus.ca – Stream live on Sportsnet+
💻 http://www.sportsnet.ca – More news & highlights on Sportsnet.ca
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhibwHk4WKw4leUt6JfRLg
https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet
Tweets by Sportsnet
https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/
@sportsnet
———————————————-
#NHL
00:00:00 – 1st Regulation Period
00:04:13 – 2nd Regulation Period
00:07:28 – 3rd Regulation Period
19 Comments
Utah has the talent, they need solid coaching. Smith needs to get Jon Cooper to come to SLC after his contract with TB is up.
Utah commentator is ass 😂
That goaltwntwr interference was weird??? What? Hahahahahahahaha come on
Стыд и позор судейству. Отобрать чистый гол у Юты. Как не стыдно.?
At 8:11 in the video, so it doesn't matter that the Utah player was pushed into the Senators goalie by a Senators player?
Damn!! Ottawa not doing well selling tickets? Basically an empty barn
Did Sportsnet actually show the goal and then show the call overturning that goal? I didn’t think I’d ever see the day.
That was a good goal, Im sick of these new criteria, a touch isn't interference.
5:27 интересно, арбитру засчитали голевую передачу ?
Let's keep it rolling.
Судьи слили игру.
Schmaltz gibt Schmalz 😅😂😀weiter so
Somebody get those utah commentators some tissues😂 GO SENS GO!
Utah deserve that 3rd goal
We got stole a goal last night ( habs fan ) and we lost that game by 1 goal . Ref suck $$hahha
Rule 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper
69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper – This rule is based on the premise
that an attacking player’s position, whether inside or outside the
crease, should not, by itself, determine whether a goal should be
allowed or disallowed. In other words, goals scored while attacking
players are standing in the crease may, in appropriate circumstances
be allowed (refer to Rule 69.7 for example). Goals should be
disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or
by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his
crease or defend his goal; or (2) an attacking player initiates
intentional or deliberate contact with a goalkeeper, inside or outside of
his goal crease. Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted,
and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of
the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable
effort to avoid such contact. The rule will be enforced exclusively in
accordance with the on-ice judgement of the Referee(s), but may be
subject to a Coach’s Challenge (see Rule 38).
For purposes of this rule, “contact,” whether incidental or
otherwise, shall mean any contact that is made between or among a
goalkeeper and attacking player(s), whether by means of a stick or
any part of the body.
The overriding rationale of this rule is that a goalkeeper should
have the ability to move freely within his goal crease without being
hindered by the actions of an attacking player. If an attacking player
enters the goal crease and, by his actions, impairs the goalkeeper’s
ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored, the goal will be
disallowed.
If an attacking player has been pushed, shoved, or fouled by a
defending player so as to cause him to come into contact with the
goalkeeper, such contact will not be deemed contact initiated by the
attacking player for purposes of this rule, provided the attacking player
has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.
Сенатор Ткачак травмирован?