D-Petey + Conor Garland + Lekkerimäki for Luke Hughes… who says no? #canucks #njdevils

11 Comments

1. 

   @gusbradley3846 4 months ago

   Can they RFA offer sheet Luke and sign him to a contract that expires with Jack’s then sign Quinn to a contract that expires at the same time giving the Hughes brothers the opportunity to sign massive deals with whoever they want? That’s Quinn’s incentive to resign in Vancouver.
   Then you get 4-5 years to convince them to play here or maybe trade L & Q in the last year as a package or just for what you can in return.

2. 

   @AndrewGibson-n8c 4 months ago

   Get rid of EP 40 for Pete sake

3. 

   @jaschan2006 4 months ago

   D-Petey, Lekkerimaki, and Garland for Luke Hughes? That is an overpay. D-Petey and Garland seems fair

4. 

   @Trumpisadick 4 months ago

   Get serious!

5. 

   @fittobetiedyed5315 4 months ago

   I would trade #40 for a bag of pucks.

6. 

   @etic9108 4 months ago

   If you're trading for one Hughes, then you're trading both. It would be the king ransom for them both. Multiple 1sts etc

7. 

   @colinpoint1862 4 months ago

   Nobody can afford all three brothers. if they do manage it, then they become the Toronto maple leafs.

8. 

   @jeremie2249 4 months ago

   EP40 at his best is a 100 point player, with selke potential. Luke is left handed same as Quinn. This is junk

9. 

   @LeeMatson-p4v 4 months ago

   That’s sickening

10. 

    @bateman4089 4 months ago

    Absolutely not

11. 

    @coreymcewen8737 4 months ago

    Dumb trade. Dont try to force some last minute desperate “keep Hughes” trade when ultimately I don’t think that would really work. Quinn might even see that as a panic move and not trust Alvin. That s not evening mentioning that we would loose out on three good players too