That’s why I’m really intrigued at the idea of an eight year deal for Jake Walman.

7 Comments

1. 

   @Jiordanios 5 months ago

   Gotta trade one of Nurse, Ekholm, or Kulak.

2. 

   @Curious-Questions-n6z 5 months ago

   That Broberg money ?

3. 

   @oopopp 5 months ago

   Walman signs for 4 years is good by me. Thats his prime years. If he walks after that I wouldn't be too upset.

4. 

   @HutzyHut 5 months ago

   He’s good but he’s old. Max 5 years an he’s done nhl

5. 

   @MrGregpayne99 5 months ago

   Have you guys hockeydb him? Love Wally but no way I'd give him more than kulak $$. 5.5 for 8…. NO

6. 

   @getwrecked488 5 months ago

   Why not, he’s only 29. It’s all about the aav….. look at Florida. They signed a 37 yr old to 6 yrs x $5+, who’ll be out of the game soon, and a failing PED dependant defenseman for 8yr x $6 +…. Ridiculous. Walman has no less upside here and would potentially be cheaper.

7. 

   @ShellSiko 5 months ago

   4 years are good for me….I dont think the Oilers are going to have trouble getting players in the next 10 years!