Incidental contact as they both skated into each other. It could have easily been Kreider that went down, but he was compact and Peterson was very wide. Good no call
That's the literal definition of incidental content. It's not like he stuck his leg out. He was in the middle of turning and his edge touched the Vancouver players edge.
25 Comments
The problems is that refs call that in other games as a penalty. Refs are widely inconsistent. But it wasn't a penalty
Good no call
Incidental contact as they both skated into each other. It could have easily been Kreider that went down, but he was compact and Peterson was very wide. Good no call
That's the literal definition of incidental content. It's not like he stuck his leg out. He was in the middle of turning and his edge touched the Vancouver players edge.
As a casual hockey watcher, it looks incidental upon repeat viewings. The refs eaither have insane vision or just guessed correctly
Krieder is trash,
A bigger RAT then Brad
Canβt see the play at all in this cropped video format
as a canucks fan who went to the game
the refs shouldβve called this trip
People actually think this was a penalty? He wasn't even facing the Canucks player when the guy ran into his skate.
Canucks fan, hard to see contact, but not first time calls not called
IβM BLIND! IβM DEAF! I WANNA BE A REF!
blud tripped on nothing
If the devils won this way the emoji would be π
Knee on knee!
You tell me if that's a penalty
Bad call but what really lost this game was the too many men on the ice
I didn't see the penalty, and no i'm not a fan of either
Vancouver player tripped his own teammate. π€£
It just looks like their skates collide, in conclusive not enough evidence to prove they were tripped.
No penalty
Yes itβs a penalty
I love how you never give us a good replay of the trip
Trash refs
They have been really really bad this year.
Worst officiating of any sport, absolutely deplorable π€¦ββοΈ
Iβm blind. Iβm deaf. I want to be a ref!