Definitely a goal but also how are you not talking how when we scored our second a guy on the panthers slashed and elbowed our player in the face, no penalty. And then Sebastian who gets cross checked twice and fights back but we get a penalty and they score on powerplay. Refs are blinds
The rule is stupid – itβs not a kicking motion but itβs a blatant redirection of the puck by a moving foot towards the goal – it was 100% the players intention to use the foot to direct the puck to the net
16 Comments
Thatβs not a clear motion to direct the puck????
Definitely a goal but also how are you not talking how when we scored our second a guy on the panthers slashed and elbowed our player in the face, no penalty. And then Sebastian who gets cross checked twice and fights back but we get a penalty and they score on powerplay. Refs are blinds
No goal
No goal….and I don't like glorida
A good soccer goal π
110% kicking motion
Depends on the definition of a kick.
I see no kick, but I understand that people might argue it is.
The rule is stupid – itβs not a kicking motion but itβs a blatant redirection of the puck by a moving foot towards the goal – it was 100% the players intention to use the foot to direct the puck to the net
We like football in Finland π
He kicked it in but no matter,Florida's got this
I went to this game and I was pissed to see how bad they played
Doesnβt matter. They getting swept
No goal π―%
Going to need more then a cheap goal to beat these panthers
Thats a redirection! It needed no kicking motion, just a trajectory change!
"should've kicked it " apprently was true.