Mastodon
@Toronto Maple Leafs

Evan Rodrigues Called For Embellishment On This Hit 😬



#NHL #Hockey #shorts #NHLshorts #NHLhighlights #StanleyCup #MapleLeafs #Toronto #TorontoMapleLeafs #Leafs #Panthers #FloridaPanthers

48 Comments

  1. The embellishment penalty came from Rodrigues going to the locker room when he was completely fine to look injured.

  2. So many dramatic complainers here. The refs have been generally doing a great job these playoffs and have let the players play. This isn't the nba…

  3. Fix this s*** Gary your sport is the best playoff sport by far but this is pissing us all off no matter who we're rooting for. That was a nasty hit where the panther was defenseless.

  4. Confused hockey fan here – arent checks right in the numbers into the boards a boarding penalty? Or am I stuck in the past on that rule?

  5. Hey, when Bennet cranks our number one goalie, who's a repeat offender, it's pathetic he got called for this tbh

  6. Actually a based called. This is the playoffs. He stayed down way too long. Brandon Hagel got up faster after being legit knocked out by Ekblad.

  7. NHL do a piss poor job not calling stuff and then get chastised for it and then the next game they call stupid stuff…can't win

  8. Does his face even touch the glass… between him and Stolarz. The flopping in this series is almost as bad as the Stars.

  9. This was not embellishment, but it was a "make-up" phantom call for the cross-check call Domi got in game 1.

  10. I do think he embellished to get the call. That would’ve been a weak boarding call too, just like the stutzle “boarding” on tanev in the first round. Neither should be called.

  11. Im gonna say, the refs either thought he jumped into the boards to make it look and sounds worse or they didnt like how he European soccer played it

  12. Clear hit from behind..could have been a 5 minute major tbh..but leafs fans im sure will defend this because in there eyes they do no wrong…but if shoe was on other foot ..god forbid

  13. Ok.. as a leafs fan that wasn’t an embellishment penalty but if it was then why did they still
    Call a 4 mins penalty for boarding 🤷‍♂️

  14. Definitely embellishment. Laughton slowed down as he was coming in and the hit wasn’t as forceful as it could have been. Rodrigues knew the hit was coming and the moment he felt contact, he buckled his legs, let himself drop and released his stick like he was paralyzed or something.

    Tanev was hit from behind in the 3rd period, got ABSOLUTELY CRUNCHED from behind. No call, no dropping of the stick. He got up immediately and limped to the bench.

  15. I'm a leafs fan – this call was absurd. When you have close calls like that you always have a moment of uncertainty of if you are actually hurt or not. Embellishment on this is ridiculous

  16. Leaf's fan here. NO idea how that's embellishment ! I'm waiting for someone to point something out I'm missing lol

  17. I dont see an embellishment BUT was he warned the whole game before this happened? Idk just grasping at straws on why they called that

  18. Well why the hell would u let laughton hit you and then you smash ur own face into the boards? Like come on learn hockey bud

  19. As much as i hate the Panthers, I think if you make a call like that as a ref you either have to publicly apologize for the error or take a blindside hit face first into the boards to prove it didnt actually hurt that bad

  20. This reminds me of the Las Vegas Panthers Series in the finals with the referees absolutely unbelievably terrible calls

Write A Comment