Watch as Winnipeg Jets forward Cole Perfetti fires a shot into the glove of St. Louis Blues goaltender Jordan Binnington, leading to a lengthy review from the officials before the call would eventually stand.
———————————————-
đź“ş http://sportsnetplus.ca – Stream live on Sportsnet+
đź’» http://www.sportsnet.ca – More news & highlights on Sportsnet.ca
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhibwHk4WKw4leUt6JfRLg
https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet
Tweets by Sportsnet
https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/
@sportsnet
———————————————-
#NHL
25 Comments
Yikes. I would probably have overturned that one. You can see the puck through the webbing. It would be different if the puck was hidden, but it's pretty visible.
Good goal. Roof it next time Perfetti. He had the whole top side.
When will the NHL officials learn the phrase "Common Sense"
When reefs call situation room bettman is on the other line.
You can't cheat the hockey gods. The Blues will lose the series.
Overhead view doesn’t look at all like the puck is over the line. I don’t know what you 13 year olds in the comments are talking about. I was actually expecting something “controversial” by reading the title, not surprised in the slightest it didn’t count.
Doesn't matter. Winny gave up a touchdown.
Was that a goal? Obviously, but can we all at least give binner his flowers? That was a hell of an effort
Jets lost by 5 goals. Who cares if this 1 went in.
Terrible decision by Toronto that was a goal
anyone with normal depth perception calls that in – so what if it was waved off – get refs with some backbone
Definitely looks like it should of been a goal, but not sure it would of mattered, Jets got spanked.
No goal. It’s simple
I knew they weren't going to call it a goal as soon I saw it
Being a diehard Blues fan since the 67-68 season, Winnipeg got robbed on that call
Not controversial
If you can't 100% see the puck is across the line , it is no goal
The puck was visibly 90% across the line but that 10% of glove webbing made it unable to be a goal.
Okay for the slow kids in the back:
Yes, the puck was probably in, but since the officials called it a no-goal at first the NHL and the officials have to prove beyond a doubt that the puck clearly crossed the line.
There just isn't a camera angle that gives them that definitive answer.
NHL logic: We know the puck is in the glove. We know the glove is in the net. We don’t know for sure if the puck is in the net.
That's a goal all day long
And people say games aren't fixed hmmmm
Its only hard to tell if you have a poor logic skills and poor spatial reasoning skills.
That is the most rig goal ever you can see that puck cross the goal line above the glove
Bad bad call terrible reffing.
I'm not a Jets fan, but it's looking like the nhl did it again
THAT IS 100% A GOAL. DONT LISTEN TO BLUES FANS.