Boston Bruins WERE WRONG To TRADE Linus Ullmark and Sign Jeremy Swayman to 8 Year Deal!
This year’s statistics paint a clear picture of why the Bruins’ decision to trade Linus Ullmark and extend Jeremy Swayman is being heavily scrutinized. Here’s how the numbers highlight the potential misstep:
Ullmark’s Continued Excellence:
Ullmark’s post-trade performance has remained at an elite level, consistently showcasing his goaltending prowess.
His stats show that he is still a top goalie in the NHL.
Swayman’s Variability:
While Swayman has shown flashes of brilliance, his performance has been less consistent than Ullmark’s.
This shows that Swayman may not be ready to be a number one goalie.
Statistical Comparison:
A direct comparison of their key goaltending metrics, such as save percentage and goals-against average, often favors Ullmark.
This statistical difference is what is making the Bruins decision look bad.
Cap Space Impact:
Ullmark’s contract was seen as a potential cap burden, but his performance justifies the cost.
The Bruins are now paying Swayman a large contract, and he is not performing as well as Ullmark.
Playoff Implications:
Goaltending is crucial in the playoffs. Ullmark’s proven playoff track record is a valuable asset that the Bruins now lack.
The Bruins may have given away a goalie that could have helped them in the playoffs.
In short, the statistics suggest the Bruins may have traded the more consistent and reliable goaltender, potentially jeopardizing their chances for sustained success.
Wanna get a question in the show? Leave a voicemail for the guys at 254-522-9406!
Follow Cam on Twitter: @realcamstuart
Follow us on Instagram! @TheCamShowShow
Like us on Facebook! @Rogue Media Sports
