Mastodon
@Detroit Red Wings

Blue Jackets’ Justin Danforth Buries Late Go-Ahead Tally, Goal Stands After High Stick Review



Watch as Columbus Blue Jackets’ Justin Danforth buries his own rebound to give his team the late lead over the Detroit Red Wings and the goal held up after the refs consulted for a potential high-stick penalty.

———————————————-

📺 http://sportsnetplus.ca – Stream live on Sportsnet+
💻 http://www.sportsnet.ca – More news & highlights on Sportsnet.ca

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVhibwHk4WKw4leUt6JfRLg
https://www.facebook.com/sportsnet

https://www.instagram.com/sportsnet/

@sportsnet

———————————————-

#NHL

40 Comments

  1. The fix is in for the Jackets. Outshot 50-15… Several blatant missed calls in the first and then the "divine hand of Johnny" guides the refs to miss the most obvious high stick call you may ever see.

    At least they will be able to pass the flag with his jersey number around for their 2 playoff games. Big story line for the nhl… Better milk it!

  2. Typical, non call what a god damn joke. The Wings got screwed. The Ref was right there looking at the play. Looks like a fix to me. The high stick took Edvinsson out of the play. No Ferraro the Wings got divinely shafted. The Gary Bettman funny league strikes again.

  3. This is a game that could cost the Wings a playoff spot at season's end. Did you notice how quickly the Refs said no penalty. Were they looking at some chick in the stands.

  4. I love that Sportsnet is throwing the refs under the bus here 😂 I hate the fact that this was the result. Wings deserve better than this.

  5. I have no horse in this race, but the defenseman got hit in the face with a stick OMG, refs, what are you doing?! My Panthers also have 4 canceled goals in 4 matches in a row this league officiating is a joke

  6. There was no review. That was the issue, the linesman could have called a double minor so that they could have reviewed it. They just discussed but didnt review

  7. Detroit shouldn’t necessarily be complaining about the missed high stick. They guys had 25 more shots than CBJ and way more offensive zone possession time but they still lost 🤷‍♂️. They had their opportunities but blew them.

  8. I have 0 rooting interest in these two teams, but holy Hell, how do you not call that? In what universe is that not a high stick?

  9. We should just 2 hand him in the face next time we play bc that’s apparently a valid strategy, what a gong show from these refs

  10. Would love to find out that the refs get suspended by the league for this non-call. Can't call it a missed call. They didn't miss it. They saw it clearly and just chose to look the other way.

  11. Rules need to be changed immediately. Not only was that a blatant high stick but it caused the other dman to lose momentum. This is absurd considering the wings will make or not make the playoffs by 1 or 2 games. This should not be happening in modern day hockey. Change the fing rules!

  12. The ref should have said it is a good goal because ESPN has said we need to switch back over to college basketball because this is America.

  13. I my personal opinion Detroit had a way better game than Columbas it’s just that when Detroit had really good chances but for most of the game they just passed the puck i watched this game at my brothers it was a good game but it would be better if they won

  14. How is that not a high sticking penalty? Does anyone have an actual explanation? Was it because the stick was resting on his shoulder/face first? Please help me understand

Write A Comment