I think the Canucks had to sign Lankinen due to Demko's continuing situation with being injured so much, that he's hurt more than he plays. I wonder what Silovs thinks of this move.
As a goalie I really feel for Demko. I think he's the best goalie we've had since Luongo. At his best, Demko is more technically sound than Lankinen but it seems to be that very technique that makes him susceptible to the leg joint problems he keeps having.
Like everyone is saying, sadly this proves the Canucks cannot trust Demko to maintain his health. Can't blame Lanks for wanting market value on his one big contract he'll get. Canucks backed up into a corner on this one.
6 Comments
When do they deal Demko, summer? TDL?
I think the Canucks had to sign Lankinen due to Demko's continuing situation with being injured so much, that he's hurt more than he plays. I wonder what Silovs thinks of this move.
Bye bye, Demko. Now they need to draft and develop a future G prospect.
Another bad contract. 5 years is too much term….. but, better than Petey's 8 years/$92 MILLION though.
As a goalie I really feel for Demko. I think he's the best goalie we've had since Luongo. At his best, Demko is more technically sound than Lankinen but it seems to be that very technique that makes him susceptible to the leg joint problems he keeps having.
Like everyone is saying, sadly this proves the Canucks cannot trust Demko to maintain his health. Can't blame Lanks for wanting market value on his one big contract he'll get. Canucks backed up into a corner on this one.