The explanation from the league is that Garland got back to touch up after the puck had entered but before the coyotes had it on their stick in the zone. If you look closely you can see a gap between the puck and the stick until it's 2-3 ft into the zone (between the blue line and the golden arches of the mcdonalds logo on the boards the puck isn't touched). An interesting call but I think they got it right.
So it was deemed that he didn't have possession therefore garland tagged up and then it was onside. That's a fine line to walk and I would like to see this goal be disallowed we don't want opinion based calls we already have it bad enough with goalie interference!
That is clearly onside, as you can have possession of the puck without actively playing it, but you have to actively play the puck on a delayed offside for the play to be blown dead. As long as no Coyote touched it inside the zone until everybody tagged up, it’s onside.
22 Comments
First
that's offside
how was this onside
Cody’s are 19-15? Maybe making a playoff run?
That was clearly offside
Idk about that
man this makeup call is crazy
That was offside lol
Whether it was offsides or not congrats to Bunting on the hat trick
This rule is so inconsistent…
What?
Thats still offsides. "He didn't have possession of the puck"..yeah right. Inconsistent rulings by Toronto yet again.
The explanation from the league is that Garland got back to touch up after the puck had entered but before the coyotes had it on their stick in the zone. If you look closely you can see a gap between the puck and the stick until it's 2-3 ft into the zone (between the blue line and the golden arches of the mcdonalds logo on the boards the puck isn't touched). An interesting call but I think they got it right.
0:57
??
ONSIDE ?!
It looked offside, but would you really take a Hatty away from someone who was working hard all game
So it was deemed that he didn't have possession therefore garland tagged up and then it was onside. That's a fine line to walk and I would like to see this goal be disallowed we don't want opinion based calls we already have it bad enough with goalie interference!
WHAT A BUNCH OF RUBBISH!!!! my team is Rubbish……..Go Kings……go…….Oh man.
This, was offside
Dear Kings fans, the AZ announcers thought it was offside too. Get mad at the league, not Nasher
That is clearly onside, as you can have possession of the puck without actively playing it, but you have to actively play the puck on a delayed offside for the play to be blown dead. As long as no Coyote touched it inside the zone until everybody tagged up, it’s onside.
surprised this hasn’t blown up after Makar’s goal